![]() I don't consider that view pessimistic, but pragmatic. And although strictly speaking a quantum anything refers to the smallest step imaginable, in its usage as a phrase, 50+ years of reading about so-far useless theories convince me that although at some distant date someone may develop an extra-dimensional theory that is not only mathematically "useful" but also produces testable predictions, none of us will still be alive to read about it. So I believe that we need a "quantum leap" in our mathematical and physical understanding of things before any useful theory using extra dimensions has any hope of becoming generally accepted. Here and there, the comments above state that there are advantages to thinking of extra dimensions in one way or another, but they always include the caveat that the theory involved has yet to be proven or has been abandoned (unsaid is the reason that it proved incapable of producing any testable predictions). I simply see that all of the arguments made in favor of extra dimensions in this and every other discussion I've read in the last 50 years include not only great enthusiasm about the concept of extra dimensions, but also note that to date, not one theory has succeeded in convincing the general community that it is valid. Lack of immediate enforcement by RG is not acceptance.Īndré Michaud : I DO think that progress may eventually be made. These and other examples of unacceptable behavior by participants here and prohibited by the RG ToS, even when presented as "ironic" or "joking," include ad hominem attacks and lack of civility.Off-topic comments are directed to the history of Physics or Mathematics.We will not respond to off-topic comments, valuing the discussion quality not the points.We declare that resolved issues are off-topic, such as "relativistic mass" (not in nature), Maxwell equations (incorrect), QM (cannot be denied), and SR (cannot be denied).More than 55,000 patents involving the laser have been granted in the United States. The laser was invented already circa 1958, uses QM and SR, contradicts the Maxwell equations, and these topics disqualify who question them.We do not accept the Copenhagen interpretation, nor any "measurement effect" or "wave collapse". Maxwell equations are incorrect, and do not explain (e.g.) diamagnetism or lasers. QM and SR are no longer subject to physics discussions at this level, and not in CS, maybe in History.Minkowski special relativity (SR) and Bohr quantum mechanics (QM) apply certainly.When protons act like electrons, they form matter gold. ![]() When the electron acts like a proton, it goes beyond matter. For the supermaterial state, protons and electrons, which can be in two different places at the same time according to quantum and string theory, depending on the same mutual movement of gold, that is, proton and electron. And this knowledge is the knowledge of matter. From here, the proton and electron, which are in two places at the same time, multiply the information. Here, the mirror matter feature occurs when the protons and electrons in the string theory, that is, the structures that the subatomic contains, act in the same way. What happens if one filamentous structure imitates the other filamentary structure? At the same time, in more than one place, the same function and action becomes a filamentous substance. He says that protons and electrons are composed of one-dimensional filamentous structures. So how do we reconcile it with string theory? String theory of the subatomic. Thus, when the proton and electron imitate each other subatomic, a movement takes place in two places at the same time. First of all, let's look at the property of the mirror neuron: they provide the quality of imitating each other. So what does this mean? We first put forward this based on the mirror neuron. It means equal positive and negative charge. Because being a neutron means no load, that is symmetrical. If the electron is negative neutron has no charge, there is a mirror substance under the atom, just like the mirror neuron in our brain. Let's think that matter consists of six protons, electrons and neutrons, there are quarks, etc. Subatomic particles create the situation above matter in the universe, and so the quality of the object on matter is formed by differentiating from subatomic, so why is that so? Sub-item and sub-item reasons do not work in the same way.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |